auto(plan): W20 targets — hara, cs-concept, aspice-assessment, 8d

Autonomous daily run (Mon 2026-05-11 PLAN).
- Regenerated STATUS.md (76/76 builders paired, 100%, after honoring two known
  builder/reviewer aliases: item-definition <-> item-def, ppap-package <-> ppap).
- Wrote docs/weekly/WEEK-2026-W20.md with 4 polish targets spanning safety,
  cyber, aspice, and quality.
- Opened GitHub issues #3-#6, one per target, labeled weekly-target + domain.
- Journaled the run in docs/AUTONOMOUS_LOG.md.

Generated by automotive-skills-daily-standup scheduled task.
This commit is contained in:
Automotive Skills Autonomous
2026-05-11 14:48:29 +00:00
parent 3c695535d4
commit 16df7a5238
3 changed files with 185 additions and 0 deletions
+22
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
# Autonomous Daily Run Log
_Maintained by `automotive-skills-daily-standup` scheduled task._
## 2026-05-11 (autonomous run, PLAN)
**Mode:** PLAN
**Action:** Generated STATUS.md, picked 4 weekly polish targets, wrote docs/weekly/WEEK-2026-W20.md, opened paired GitHub issues #3#6.
**Files touched:**
- `STATUS.md` (regenerated, full builder × reviewer pairing table)
- `docs/weekly/WEEK-2026-W20.md` (new)
- `docs/AUTONOMOUS_LOG.md` (this entry)
**Tests:** N/A (no test suite in this repo yet)
**Skill count:** 76 builders / 76 reviewers / 100.0% paired (after applying the two known aliases: `item-definition-builder ↔ item-def-checklist-reviewer` and `ppap-package-builder ↔ ppap-checklist-reviewer`)
**Open issues:** 5 (was 1 — the four `weekly-target` issues opened today + the pre-existing untriaged #2 "goodd")
**Notes:** Quiet baseline: no commits in the past 7 days; the suite is sitting at its initial 152-skill seed. STATUS.md showed 100% pairing once the two aliases were honored, so no orphan list this week. Target selection fell out of the least-recently-touched bucket (everything in it was touched on 2026-05-01), and I deliberately picked one builder from each of safety / cyber / aspice / quality rather than draining a single domain. Skipped trying to also touch `.skill` content today — PLAN mode produces the plan and the issues, not the edits. Issue #2 ("goodd") is intentionally left untouched until Sunday's TRIAGE.
**Follow-ups:**
- TueThu (POLISH): work issues #3#6 in order, one per day, with `docs/skill-polish-log/<name>.md` notes per the task spec.
- Next PLAN (W21): explicitly pull at least one target from comms / autosar / diagnostics / calibration to rebalance the rotation.
- Bake the two builder↔reviewer aliases into a `.skill-aliases` map if a third alias ever appears, so STATUS generation isn't tripping on naming drift.
- Issue #2 "goodd" still needs human attention or Sunday TRIAGE labeling (currently too vague to label with ≥80% confidence).
+71
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
# Week of 2026-05-11 → 2026-05-17 (ISO 2026-W20)
_Autonomous PLAN entry — generated by the daily-standup task on 2026-05-11._
## Recap (past 7 days)
```
(no commits in the last 7 days — the suite is at its initial 152-skill baseline)
```
Total commits to date: 3 (seed + skill expansion + README). Open issues: 1 (#2, an
untriaged test issue with no labels — handled in Sunday's TRIAGE pass).
## Targets for this week (4)
Each target gets a paired GitHub issue (`weekly-target` + domain label). Definition of
Done is the one-sentence check below — keep edits surgical; if a target balloons, defer
it to next week and record the why.
### 1. `hara-builder.skill` — domain: **safety**
- **Why:** flagship ISO 26262-3 concept-phase doc and the input for FSC; every downstream
safety builder depends on its xlsx shape, so polish here pays out across 16 other skills.
- **DoD:** description ≤ 1024 chars, frontmatter has all required fields, and the trigger
list mentions at least HARA + hazard analysis + ASIL + safety goal + item definition
within the first 400 chars.
### 2. `cs-concept-builder.skill` — domain: **cyber**
- **Why:** ISO/SAE 21434 cybersecurity concept derivation; counterpart to FSC on the
security side. Currently last-touched 2026-05-01, never polished after seed.
- **DoD:** description reviewed for accuracy of the six security properties (AAICAN), and
trigger phrases include both formal terms (CSR derivation, CAL allocation) and casual
framings ("derive cyber controls from goals").
### 3. `aspice-assessment-builder.skill` — domain: **aspice**
- **Why:** ASPICE PAM v3.1/v4.0 anchor; consumed by gap-analysis and improvement-plan
builders, so the I/O contract here gates the whole ASPICE cluster.
- **DoD:** confirm the 13-tab output list in the description matches the actual builder
schema, and trigger list mentions both v3.1 and v4.0.
### 4. `8d-problem-solving-builder.skill` — domain: **quality**
- **Why:** warranty / customer-complaint workhorse; first-line skill for field-failure
response. Last-touched 2026-05-01.
- **DoD:** description names all 8 disciplines (D1D8) and triggers include "warranty
response," "customer complaint," and "corrective action tracking."
## Domain spread check
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| safety | 1 |
| cyber | 1 |
| aspice | 1 |
| quality | 1 |
Spread looks healthy — 4 distinct domains, no concentration. Notable gaps this week:
no v&v, comms, autosar, diagnostics, calibration, mbse, sysml, sotif, or program-mgmt
target. Acceptable for W20 because the LRT bucket (last-touched 2026-05-01) is itself
concentrated in safety/cyber/aspice/quality; next week's PLAN should explicitly pull
from the comms / autosar / diagnostics / calibration clusters to keep rotation balanced.
## Issue links
_Filled in by the create-issue step of this same run; if any cell is blank the API call
failed and the follow-up is captured in the journal._
| Target | Issue |
|---|---|
| hara-builder | [#3](https://github.com/jherrodthomas/automotive-skills-suite/issues/3) |
| cs-concept-builder | [#4](https://github.com/jherrodthomas/automotive-skills-suite/issues/4) |
| aspice-assessment-builder | [#5](https://github.com/jherrodthomas/automotive-skills-suite/issues/5) |
| 8d-problem-solving-builder | [#6](https://github.com/jherrodthomas/automotive-skills-suite/issues/6) |