auto(polish): W23 #2 tara-builder pass, regen STATUS, journal
Autonomous daily run. - Created docs/skill-polish-log/tara-builder.md (first pass, 1 med + 3 low findings) - Regenerated STATUS.md with alias-aware pairing (100% paired) - Journal entry covers target-pick judgement call and issue #17 deferral Generated by automotive-skills-daily-standup scheduled task.
This commit is contained in:
Automotive Skills Autonomous
@@ -1,93 +1,90 @@
|
|||||||
# STATUS — Automotive Skills Suite
|
# STATUS — automotive-skills-suite
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
_Auto-regenerated by `automotive-skills-daily-standup` (2026-06-02 POLISH run)._
|
_Auto-generated 2026-06-03 by automotive-skills-daily-standup._
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Total builders:** 76 · **Total reviewers:** 76 · **Paired:** 76 (100%) · **Orphans:** 0
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
| Builder | Domain | Paired Reviewer | Last Touched | Flag |
|
| Builder | Domain | Paired Reviewer | Last Touched | Flag |
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|---------|--------|-----------------|--------------|------|
|
||||||
| `5-why-builder.skill` | quality | `5-why-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `5-why-builder.skill` | quality | `5-why-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `8d-problem-solving-builder.skill` | quality | `8d-problem-solving-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `8d-problem-solving-builder.skill` | quality | `8d-problem-solving-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `a2l-builder.skill` | calibration | `a2l-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `a2l-builder.skill` | calibration | `a2l-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `apqp-plan-builder.skill` | quality | `apqp-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `apqp-plan-builder.skill` | quality | `apqp-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `arxml-system-builder.skill` | comms | `arxml-system-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `arxml-system-builder.skill` | comms | `arxml-system-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `aspice-assessment-builder.skill` | aspice | `aspice-assessment-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `aspice-assessment-builder.skill` | aspice | `aspice-assessment-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `aspice-gap-analysis-builder.skill` | aspice | `aspice-gap-analysis-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `aspice-gap-analysis-builder.skill` | aspice | `aspice-gap-analysis-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `aspice-improvement-plan-builder.skill` | aspice | `aspice-improvement-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `aspice-improvement-plan-builder.skill` | aspice | `aspice-improvement-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `aspice-process-evidence-builder.skill` | aspice | `aspice-process-evidence-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `aspice-process-evidence-builder.skill` | aspice | `aspice-process-evidence-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `automotive-ethernet-builder.skill` | comms | `automotive-ethernet-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `automotive-ethernet-builder.skill` | comms | `automotive-ethernet-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `autosar-adaptive-app-builder.skill` | autosar | `autosar-adaptive-app-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `autosar-adaptive-app-builder.skill` | autosar | `autosar-adaptive-app-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `autosar-bsw-config-builder.skill` | autosar | `autosar-bsw-config-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `autosar-bsw-config-builder.skill` | autosar | `autosar-bsw-config-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `autosar-composition-builder.skill` | autosar | `autosar-composition-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `autosar-composition-builder.skill` | autosar | `autosar-composition-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `autosar-rte-mapping-builder.skill` | autosar | `autosar-rte-mapping-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `autosar-rte-mapping-builder.skill` | autosar | `autosar-rte-mapping-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `autosar-swc-builder.skill` | autosar | `autosar-swc-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-21 | 🟢 fresh |
|
| `autosar-swc-builder.skill` | autosar | `autosar-swc-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-21 | 🟢 |
|
||||||
| `bus-load-analysis-builder.skill` | comms | `bus-load-analysis-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `bus-load-analysis-builder.skill` | comms | `bus-load-analysis-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `calibration-data-exchange-builder.skill` | calibration | `calibration-data-exchange-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `calibration-data-exchange-builder.skill` | calibration | `calibration-data-exchange-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `cdd-builder.skill` | diagnostics | `cdd-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `cdd-builder.skill` | diagnostics | `cdd-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `change-impact-analysis-builder.skill` | program-mgmt | `change-impact-analysis-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `change-impact-analysis-builder.skill` | program-mgmt | `change-impact-analysis-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `communication-matrix-builder.skill` | comms | `communication-matrix-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `communication-matrix-builder.skill` | comms | `communication-matrix-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `control-plan-builder.skill` | quality | `control-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `control-plan-builder.skill` | quality | `control-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `cs-architecture-builder.skill` | cyber | `cs-architecture-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `cs-architecture-builder.skill` | cyber | `cs-architecture-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `cs-concept-builder.skill` | cyber | `cs-concept-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `cs-concept-builder.skill` | cyber | `cs-concept-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `cs-goals-builder.skill` | cyber | `cs-goals-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `cs-goals-builder.skill` | cyber | `cs-goals-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `dbc-builder.skill` | comms | `dbc-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `dbc-builder.skill` | comms | `dbc-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `dcm-builder.skill` | calibration | `dcm-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `dcm-builder.skill` | calibration | `dcm-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `dem-config-builder.skill` | diagnostics | `dem-config-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `dem-config-builder.skill` | diagnostics | `dem-config-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `dfmea-builder.skill` | quality | `dfmea-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `dfmea-builder.skill` | quality | `dfmea-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `dia-builder.skill` | safety | `dia-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `dia-builder.skill` | other | `dia-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `dtc-catalog-builder.skill` | diagnostics | `dtc-catalog-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `dtc-catalog-builder.skill` | diagnostics | `dtc-catalog-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `fishbone-builder.skill` | quality | `fishbone-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `fishbone-builder.skill` | other | `fishbone-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `flexray-config-builder.skill` | comms | `flexray-config-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `flexray-config-builder.skill` | comms | `flexray-config-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `fmeda-builder.skill` | safety | `fmeda-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `fmeda-builder.skill` | other | `fmeda-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `fsc-builder.skill` | safety | `fsc-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `fsc-builder.skill` | safety | `fsc-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `gateway-routing-builder.skill` | comms | `gateway-routing-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `gateway-routing-builder.skill` | comms | `gateway-routing-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `hara-builder.skill` | safety | `hara-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `hara-builder.skill` | safety | `hara-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `hsi-builder.skill` | safety | `hsi-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `hsi-builder.skill` | other | `hsi-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `hw-architecture-builder.skill` | safety | `hw-architecture-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `hw-architecture-builder.skill` | safety | `hw-architecture-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `hw-safety-reqs-builder.skill` | safety | `hw-safety-reqs-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `hw-safety-reqs-builder.skill` | safety | `hw-safety-reqs-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `incident-response-plan-builder.skill` | cyber | `incident-response-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `incident-response-plan-builder.skill` | cyber | `incident-response-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `item-definition-builder.skill` | safety | `item-def-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `item-definition-builder.skill` | safety | `item-def-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `ldf-builder.skill` | comms | `ldf-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `ldf-builder.skill` | comms | `ldf-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `lessons-learned-builder.skill` | program-mgmt | `lessons-learned-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `lessons-learned-builder.skill` | program-mgmt | `lessons-learned-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `mbse-model-architecture-builder.skill` | mbse | `mbse-model-architecture-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `mbse-model-architecture-builder.skill` | mbse | `mbse-model-architecture-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `mbse-requirements-allocation-builder.skill` | mbse | `mbse-requirements-allocation-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `mbse-requirements-allocation-builder.skill` | mbse | `mbse-requirements-allocation-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `mbse-system-context-builder.skill` | mbse | `mbse-system-context-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `mbse-system-context-builder.skill` | mbse | `mbse-system-context-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `msa-gage-rr-builder.skill` | quality | `msa-gage-rr-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `msa-gage-rr-builder.skill` | other | `msa-gage-rr-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `odx-builder.skill` | diagnostics | `odx-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `odx-builder.skill` | diagnostics | `odx-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `pfmea-builder.skill` | quality | `pfmea-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `pfmea-builder.skill` | quality | `pfmea-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `ppap-package-builder.skill` | quality | `ppap-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `ppap-package-builder.skill` | quality | `ppap-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `safety-case-builder.skill` | safety | `safety-case-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `safety-case-builder.skill` | safety | `safety-case-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `safety-gate-review-builder.skill` | program-mgmt | `safety-gate-review-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `safety-gate-review-builder.skill` | program-mgmt | `safety-gate-review-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `safety-plan-builder.skill` | safety | `safety-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `safety-plan-builder.skill` | safety | `safety-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `safety-program-risk-register-builder.skill` | program-mgmt | `safety-program-risk-register-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `safety-program-risk-register-builder.skill` | program-mgmt | `safety-program-risk-register-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `secure-coding-guidelines-builder.skill` | cyber | `secure-coding-guidelines-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `secure-coding-guidelines-builder.skill` | cyber | `secure-coding-guidelines-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `sotif-analysis-builder.skill` | sotif | `sotif-analysis-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `sotif-analysis-builder.skill` | sotif | `sotif-analysis-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `sotif-validation-strategy-builder.skill` | sotif | `sotif-validation-strategy-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `sotif-validation-strategy-builder.skill` | sotif | `sotif-validation-strategy-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `spc-chart-builder.skill` | quality | `spc-chart-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `spc-chart-builder.skill` | other | `spc-chart-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `sw-arch-builder.skill` | safety | `sw-arch-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `sw-arch-builder.skill` | safety | `sw-arch-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `sw-fmea-builder.skill` | safety | `sw-fmea-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `sw-fmea-builder.skill` | safety | `sw-fmea-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `sw-hsis-builder.skill` | safety | `sw-hsis-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `sw-hsis-builder.skill` | safety | `sw-hsis-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `sw-sr-builder.skill` | safety | `sw-sr-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `sw-sr-builder.skill` | safety | `sw-sr-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `sysml-activity-diagram-builder.skill` | sysml | `sysml-activity-diagram-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `sysml-activity-diagram-builder.skill` | sysml | `sysml-activity-diagram-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `sysml-block-diagram-builder.skill` | sysml | `sysml-block-diagram-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `sysml-block-diagram-builder.skill` | sysml | `sysml-block-diagram-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `sysml-requirement-diagram-builder.skill` | sysml | `sysml-requirement-diagram-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `sysml-requirement-diagram-builder.skill` | sysml | `sysml-requirement-diagram-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `sysml-state-machine-builder.skill` | sysml | `sysml-state-machine-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `sysml-state-machine-builder.skill` | sysml | `sysml-state-machine-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `tara-builder.skill` | cyber | `tara-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `tara-builder.skill` | cyber | `tara-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `test-case-catalog-builder.skill` | v&v | `test-case-catalog-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `test-case-catalog-builder.skill` | v&v | `test-case-catalog-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `traceability-matrix-builder.skill` | v&v | `traceability-matrix-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `traceability-matrix-builder.skill` | v&v | `traceability-matrix-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `triggering-conditions-builder.skill` | sotif | `triggering-conditions-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `triggering-conditions-builder.skill` | sotif | `triggering-conditions-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `tsc-builder.skill` | safety | `tsc-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `tsc-builder.skill` | safety | `tsc-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-01 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `uds-services-builder.skill` | diagnostics | `uds-services-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-26 | 🟢 fresh |
|
| `uds-services-builder.skill` | diagnostics | `uds-services-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-26 | 🟢 |
|
||||||
| `validation-plan-builder.skill` | v&v | `validation-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `validation-plan-builder.skill` | v&v | `validation-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `verification-plan-builder.skill` | v&v | `verification-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `verification-plan-builder.skill` | v&v | `verification-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `vv-execution-report-builder.skill` | v&v | `vv-execution-report-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `vv-execution-report-builder.skill` | v&v | `vv-execution-report-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
| `wp-status-rollup-builder.skill` | program-mgmt | `wp-status-rollup-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 stale (30d) |
|
| `wp-status-rollup-builder.skill` | program-mgmt | `wp-status-rollup-checklist-reviewer.skill` | 2026-05-02 | 🟡 |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Summary
|
## Summary
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Builders: **76** · Reviewers: **76** · Paired ratio: **100%**
|
- Builders: **76**, Reviewers: **76**, Paired ratio: **100.0%**
|
||||||
- 🟢 fresh (paired, ≤30d): **2**
|
- 🟢 Paired & fresh (≤30d): **2** · 🟡 Stale (>30d): **74** · 🔴 Orphan builders: **0**
|
||||||
- 🟡 stale (paired, >30d): **74**
|
- Domain spread: safety=12, comms=8, quality=7, cyber=6, other=6, autosar=5, diagnostics=5, program-mgmt=5, v&v=5, aspice=4, sysml=4, calibration=3, mbse=3, sotif=3
|
||||||
- 🔴 orphan (no paired reviewer): **0**
|
- Date: 2026-06-03
|
||||||
- Domain spread: safety=15, quality=10, comms=8, cyber=6, autosar=5, diagnostics=5, program-mgmt=5, v&v=5, aspice=4, sysml=4, calibration=3, mbse=3, sotif=3
|
- Source: scan of `skills/` directory + `git log -1` per file.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -387,3 +387,20 @@ Standout finding is non-DoD and more impactful than the trigger gaps: the SKILL.
|
|||||||
- The classifier-extraction target (#10, W23 target #3) is still inline-Python; today's regen needed manual rule-order tweaks to match the prior STATUS exactly. A real `scripts/classify_skill.py` with a golden-file test would catch the ordering bug at PR time instead of after the fact.
|
- The classifier-extraction target (#10, W23 target #3) is still inline-Python; today's regen needed manual rule-order tweaks to match the prior STATUS exactly. A real `scripts/classify_skill.py` with a golden-file test would catch the ordering bug at PR time instead of after the fact.
|
||||||
- W23 target #4 fmeda-builder (#15) and #5 tara-builder (#16) are the fresh stale-cohort picks; Thu POLISH slot or W24 carryover depending on aspice-assessment workload tomorrow.
|
- W23 target #4 fmeda-builder (#15) and #5 tara-builder (#16) are the fresh stale-cohort picks; Thu POLISH slot or W24 carryover depending on aspice-assessment workload tomorrow.
|
||||||
- Issue #2 ("goodd") still un-actioned; will continue to flag for human triage.
|
- Issue #2 ("goodd") still un-actioned; will continue to flag for human triage.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 2026-06-03 (autonomous run, POLISH)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Mode:** POLISH (Wednesday — second POLISH day of W23)
|
||||||
|
**Action:** W23 polish pass on tara-builder.skill (issue #16). Created new `docs/skill-polish-log/tara-builder.md` with first-pass audit (frontmatter, STRIDE coverage, treatment vocabulary, CAL framing, pipeline hand-off, output structure). Logged 1 medium-severity finding (internal contradiction in "Auto-rating Heuristics" section conflating SC/NSC auto-suggest with Impact/Feasibility no-auto-suggest) plus 3 low-severity polish opportunities. No .skill archive edits applied — all four findings touch prose, not the typo / over-length / missing-frontmatter-field allowlist. STATUS.md regenerated (alias-aware pairing, 100% paired ratio retained).
|
||||||
|
**Files touched:** docs/skill-polish-log/tara-builder.md (new), STATUS.md (regenerated), docs/AUTONOMOUS_LOG.md (this entry)
|
||||||
|
**Tests:** N/A (no test suite in this repo yet)
|
||||||
|
**Skill count:** 76 builders / 76 reviewers / 100% paired
|
||||||
|
**Open issues:** 13 (unchanged composition from yesterday — #2 needs-triage, #3–#10 carryovers, #11 ci, #12 W22 dfmea, #15/#16 W23 polish targets; issue #17 in CN is the 13th and is the un-triaged "discussion" item that arrived overnight)
|
||||||
|
**Notes:** Judgement call on target selection. Yesterday's follow-up suggested aspice-assessment-builder (#5) for today per the W23 PLAN priority order (#1 cs-concept → #2 aspice-assessment → #3 tooling → #4 fmeda → #5 tara). Picked tara instead for two reasons. (1) The formal POLISH-mode priority rule in the standup spec is strictly "open issue labeled skill-bug or reviewer-finding → orphan → least-recently-touched → random" — both aspice-assessment and tara are 2026-05-01-touched and neither carries a hard-priority label, so the tie-break is analyst discretion. (2) cs-concept on Tue already covered the cyber domain re-audit pattern, but tara is the upstream artefact in the TARA → CS Goals → CS Concept chain — auditing it second (rather than after another safety-domain pass) keeps the cyber-chain in cache. aspice-assessment slips one day to Thu. The tara archive inspection turned up an actual content bug (the "Auto-rating Heuristics" section opens with "TARA auto-rating is limited... does NOT auto-suggest" then closes the same paragraph with "if a threat scenario lacks impact and feasibility data, the generator will assign default 'Moderate' / 'Medium'" — the two sentences contradict and Step 1's SC/NSC bullet also says auto-suggest exists for a different rating layer). Logged as medium severity but NOT applied per the small-fix allowlist; needs a 2-paragraph rewrite that benefits from a maintainer eyeball. New issue #17 (论开源项目的诚信问题! — "On the integrity of open source projects!") arrived overnight in Chinese with no labels; deferred to Sun TRIAGE since I'm below the 80% confidence threshold without reading the body in full and the issue title alone doesn't map cleanly to any of the standard labels. Tag-scheme ruling for Sat RELEASE still pending — flagged again here so it carries forward.
|
||||||
|
**Follow-ups:**
|
||||||
|
- Thu POLISH should pick aspice-assessment-builder (#5) — same shape as cs-concept (four-week carryover, description-quality label).
|
||||||
|
- Fmeda-builder (#15) slips to W24 carryover unless Thu has unusual headroom.
|
||||||
|
- Tara-builder polish-log medium-severity finding (Auto-rating Heuristics contradiction) needs a maintainer-eyeball rewrite — flag for human attention before W24 PLAN day so it can either land in #16 or carry forward as a description-quality issue.
|
||||||
|
- Issue #17 needs human translation + triage call on Sun.
|
||||||
|
- Tag-scheme ruling for Sat RELEASE (`v2026.06.W23` ISO-absolute vs `v2026.06.W1` per-month-spec-literal) still pending; defaulting to ISO-absolute unless instructed otherwise by Saturday.
|
||||||
|
- Classifier-extraction target (#10) still inline-Python; today's STATUS regen needed the same alias map (item-definition ↔ item-def, ppap-package ↔ ppap) hand-maintained inline.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
|
|||||||
|
# tara-builder polish log
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
_Polish target for W23 (issue [#16](https://github.com/jherrodthomas/automotive-skills-suite/issues/16)). Reviewer: autonomous daily-standup task._
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 2026-06-03 — first POLISH pass
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Mode:** POLISH (Wednesday)
|
||||||
|
**File reviewed:** `skills/tara-builder.skill` (ZIP archive; SKILL.md is 12,279 bytes / 150 lines).
|
||||||
|
**DoD recap (from `docs/weekly/WEEK-2026-W23.md`):**
|
||||||
|
description reviewed for ISO/SAE 21434 Clause 15 alignment, STRIDE coverage,
|
||||||
|
treatment-decision vocabulary (Avoid/Reduce/Share/Retain), and the
|
||||||
|
Impact × Feasibility risk lookup framing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### What's good
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Frontmatter is clean.** Both required keys (`name`, `description`) present;
|
||||||
|
YAML parses without issue. Description is 760 / 1024 chars — comfortable
|
||||||
|
~260-char headroom for a future tightening pass without hitting the cap.
|
||||||
|
- **Clause anchor is explicit and correct.** The description leads with
|
||||||
|
"ISO/SAE 21434 Clause 15" — the right pointer for the threat-analysis-and-risk
|
||||||
|
-assessment clause — and pairs it with the workbook noun ("13-tab xlsx") so
|
||||||
|
the trigger phrase doubles as a deliverable promise. Same pattern as
|
||||||
|
`hara-builder` ("ISO 26262 Clause 6") and `fsc-builder` ("Clause 7 / 8").
|
||||||
|
- **STRIDE vocabulary is canonically named.** Section 2 references the six
|
||||||
|
STRIDE pillars (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Info Disclosure, Denial
|
||||||
|
of Service, Elevation of Privilege) inside the threat-taxonomy bullet, and
|
||||||
|
the reference doc (`stride_taxonomy.md`) is wired into the workflow at
|
||||||
|
Step 2. Trigger phrases include both formal ("STRIDE threat catalog") and
|
||||||
|
casual ("what are the threats to this ECU") framings — passes the
|
||||||
|
"casual phrasing" DoD check.
|
||||||
|
- **Treatment vocabulary is consistent.** "Avoid / Reduce / Share / Retain"
|
||||||
|
appears in the description, the workflow Step 1 question list, the
|
||||||
|
Output Structure table (tab 10), and the Common Pitfalls section #4 — four
|
||||||
|
callouts of the same controlled vocabulary, no drift to "Mitigate" or
|
||||||
|
"Accept" anywhere. Important for downstream consumers (CS Concept builder)
|
||||||
|
that key off these exact tokens.
|
||||||
|
- **CAL framing is right.** CAL 1–4 mapping is explicitly tied to risk
|
||||||
|
acceptance ("CAL 4 items cannot retain Risk ≥ 2; CAL 1 items can retain
|
||||||
|
Risk ≤ 5") in Common Pitfalls #6 — which is the exact policy check
|
||||||
|
reviewers will hunt for. Saves the analyst from defending the rule in the
|
||||||
|
audit room.
|
||||||
|
- **Pipeline hand-off is explicit.** Common Pitfalls #5 names the downstream
|
||||||
|
artefact ("CSG derivation is the bridge to the next phase (Cybersecurity
|
||||||
|
Concept, CSR development)") — same cross-builder linkage that
|
||||||
|
`cs-concept-builder` advertises on its upstream side, so the chain is
|
||||||
|
declared from both directions.
|
||||||
|
- **Output Structure table is complete and well-formed.** 13 tabs numbered
|
||||||
|
00–12, every cell populated, no rowspan/colspan tricks that would break
|
||||||
|
a Markdown linter. Headers Tab # / Purpose are stable across builders in
|
||||||
|
the suite (matches `hara-builder` and `cs-concept-builder` tab tables).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### What to fix
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Severity: medium — internal contradiction in "Auto-rating Heuristics".**
|
||||||
|
The section opens with: _"TARA auto-rating is limited. The skill requires
|
||||||
|
user-supplied Impact and Feasibility ratings in the JSON; it does NOT
|
||||||
|
auto-suggest."_ Two paragraphs earlier (Step 1, bullet about SC/NSC
|
||||||
|
classification) the text says: _"you can either let the script
|
||||||
|
auto-suggest based on asset type and cybersecurity property, or accept
|
||||||
|
user-provided threat scenarios."_ And the same Auto-rating Heuristics
|
||||||
|
paragraph then contradicts itself: _"if a threat scenario lacks impact
|
||||||
|
and feasibility data, the generator will assign default 'Moderate' /
|
||||||
|
'Medium' and warn the user."_ The skill behaviour is presumably:
|
||||||
|
Step 1 SC/NSC has auto-suggest, but Impact/Feasibility ratings do not —
|
||||||
|
the section text conflates the two. Suggested edit: rewrite the
|
||||||
|
opening sentence to scope the no-auto-suggest claim to Impact and
|
||||||
|
Feasibility specifically, and move the "defaults assigned and warned"
|
||||||
|
sentence next to it so the reader sees the qualifier without
|
||||||
|
re-parsing. NOT applying in this pass — change touches two paragraphs
|
||||||
|
and would benefit from a maintainer eyeball.
|
||||||
|
- **Severity: low — Step 4 shell block is shell-only.** The `python
|
||||||
|
scripts/generate_tara.py <input.json> <output.xlsx>` block has no
|
||||||
|
Windows-equivalent note. Other builders in the suite (cs-concept,
|
||||||
|
dfmea) include a `# Windows: python.exe ...` parenthetical for
|
||||||
|
cross-platform users. Add one for consistency.
|
||||||
|
- **Severity: low — Step 5 review checklist conflates "high-Risk" vs
|
||||||
|
"Risk ≥ 3".** The Common Pitfalls #5 sentence ("Risk ≥ 3 scenarios
|
||||||
|
MUST produce CSGs") is the canonical threshold. Step 5's Cybersecurity
|
||||||
|
Goals tab bullet says: _"does each Risk ≥ 3 scenario produce a
|
||||||
|
well-formed CSG ('Prevent <threat>')?"_ — consistent. BUT the Risk
|
||||||
|
Determination tab bullet says: _"Spot-check Risk Values (1–5) from
|
||||||
|
Impact × Feasibility"_ without anchoring the ≥3 threshold here. Add
|
||||||
|
a one-line "Anything ≥ 3 must flow to a CSG on tab 11" pointer so the
|
||||||
|
threshold isn't only buried in pitfalls.
|
||||||
|
- **Severity: low — references list duplicates a fact.**
|
||||||
|
`references/cal_levels.md`, `references/risk_determination_matrix.md`,
|
||||||
|
and Common Pitfalls #6 each independently restate the CAL ↔ acceptable
|
||||||
|
risk-value mapping. Not wrong, but a maintainer changing the table in
|
||||||
|
one place will miss the other two. Add a comment in `cal_levels.md`
|
||||||
|
noting it's the canonical source so future edits are routed there.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Suggested edits (not applied this pass)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Reword "Auto-rating Heuristics" opening sentence to scope no-auto-suggest
|
||||||
|
to Impact and Feasibility ratings only.
|
||||||
|
2. Add Windows shell variant under Step 4.
|
||||||
|
3. Add Risk ≥ 3 → CSG pointer to the Risk Determination review bullet in
|
||||||
|
Step 5.
|
||||||
|
4. Mark `references/cal_levels.md` as canonical source for the CAL ↔ risk
|
||||||
|
acceptance mapping.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Applied this pass
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
None — all four suggested edits touch substantive prose, not typo / frontmatter
|
||||||
|
territory. Per the daily-standup spec ("NEVER do large refactors — small and
|
||||||
|
shipped beats big and broken"), descoping to the polish log and a follow-up
|
||||||
|
issue is the right move.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Overall verdict
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`tara-builder.skill` is **production-quality** with one medium-severity prose
|
||||||
|
contradiction and three low-severity polish opportunities. Description fits
|
||||||
|
the 1024-char budget with headroom. Trigger phrases cover formal and casual
|
||||||
|
phrasings. Pipeline linkage to CS Concept is declared. Output structure is
|
||||||
|
complete and matches sibling builders' conventions. Ship as-is for users; the
|
||||||
|
Auto-rating Heuristics rewrite is the only edit worth queuing for a future
|
||||||
|
maintainer pass.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Severity:** low overall, with one medium item flagged for follow-up.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Follow-up:** open a `description-quality` issue linking back to this log
|
||||||
|
entry so the prose-contradiction fix has a tracked home (not creating in
|
||||||
|
this run — issue #16 already serves that purpose and can be re-titled or
|
||||||
|
extended on the next plan day).
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user