opc_agent/automotive-skills-suite
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

auto(polish): regen STATUS.md and log W20 hara-builder polish findings

Browse Source 
Autonomous daily run.
- Regenerated STATUS.md (76/76 paired, 100%; domain classifier now routes
  dia/fmeda/hsi/item-definition to safety instead of "other").
- Wrote docs/skill-polish-log/hara-builder.md with three low-severity
  findings and a drafted <=1024-char description rewrite. No .skill
  edits applied (none matched the autonomous-edit allowlist).
- Journal entry appended to docs/AUTONOMOUS_LOG.md.

Generated by automotive-skills-daily-standup scheduled task.
This commit is contained in:
Automotive Skills Autonomous
2026-05-12 11:07:13 +00:00
parent 16df7a5238
commit 5b6ad4e1c0
3 changed files with 139 additions and 11 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/AUTONOMOUS_LOG.md
+18
View File
@@ -20,3 +20,21 @@ _Maintained by `automotive-skills-daily-standup` scheduled task._
- Bake the two builder↔reviewer aliases into a `.skill-aliases` map if a third alias ever appears, so STATUS generation isn't tripping on naming drift.
- Issue #2 "goodd" still needs human attention or Sunday TRIAGE labeling (currently too vague to label with ≥80% confidence).
## 2026-05-12 (autonomous run, POLISH)
**Mode:** POLISH
**Action:** Regenerated STATUS.md and ran first POLISH pass on `hara-builder.skill` (W20 issue #3). Wrote `docs/skill-polish-log/hara-builder.md` with three low-severity findings and a drafted ≤1024-char description rewrite. No `.skill` edits applied — none of the findings matched the autonomous-edit allowlist (typo / over-length / missing required field).
**Files touched:**
- `STATUS.md` (regenerated — domain classifier fixed to route `dia/fmeda/hsi/item-definition` to **safety** instead of `other`; was 4 "other" rows yesterday, now 0)
- `docs/skill-polish-log/hara-builder.md` (new)
- `docs/AUTONOMOUS_LOG.md` (this entry)
**Tests:** N/A (no test suite in this repo yet)
**Skill count:** 76 builders / 76 reviewers / 100.0% paired (aliases honored: `item-definition-builder ↔ item-def-checklist-reviewer`, `ppap-package-builder ↔ ppap-checklist-reviewer`)
**Open issues:** 5 (#2 untriaged + #3–#6 the W20 weekly targets — unchanged from yesterday)
**Notes:** POLISH priority order ran through: no `skill-bug` / `reviewer-finding` issues open, no orphan builders, so I fell to least-recently-touched and picked issue #3's target (`hara-builder.skill`) — which is also W20-target #1 by design. The skill is in good shape overall (911-char description, clean YAML frontmatter, mentor-quality common-mistakes section); the only DoD gap is that the phrase "safety goal" first appears at char ~506 instead of the asked-for first-400-char window. A drafted rewrite is in the polish log and is **not** auto-applied because the spec restricts autonomous edits to typo / length / missing-field fixes, and this is editorial re-ordering. Two side benefits of today's STATUS regeneration: caught and fixed a domain-classifier bug (4 skills were labeled `other`), and confirmed the 100% paired-ratio assertion from yesterday's PLAN entry holds.
**Follow-ups:**
- Tomorrow (Wed): POLISH issue #4 — `cs-concept-builder.skill`. Same playbook.
- Human review: if the proposed `hara-builder` description rewrite looks right, ship it as a manual commit and close #3. If it doesn't, leave a comment on #3 and I'll re-touch with the corrected direction next week.
- Future hardening: bake the four extra safety-domain prefixes (`dia/fmeda/hsi/item-definition`) into a constants file so the classifier doesn't drift again on the next regeneration script tweak.
- Issue #2 ("goodd") still needs Sunday TRIAGE — still too low-confidence to label.