Files
automotive-skills-suite/docs/skill-polish-log/uds-services-builder.md
T
Automotive Skills Autonomous 985078096b auto(polish): W22 #1 uds-services-builder pass, regen STATUS
Autonomous daily run.
- POLISH: rewrote uds-services-builder frontmatter description (285->953 chars) with broad triggers + sibling-skill redirects to odx/cdd/dtc-catalog/dem-config
- POLISH: aligned body trigger sentence with new description
- LOG: docs/skill-polish-log/uds-services-builder.md created
- STATUS regen: 76 builders / 76 reviewers / 100% paired (pairing overrides preserved)

Generated by automotive-skills-daily-standup scheduled task.
2026-05-26 11:08:18 +00:00

3.3 KiB

Polish log — uds-services-builder.skill

2026-05-26 (autonomous POLISH run, W22 target #1 / issue #9, two-week carryover)

Domain: diagnostics · Severity: med · Outcome: small fix applied

What's good

  • SKILL.md cleanly structured: an Input JSON schema, a 13-tab Output contract enumerating service inventory / DID / RID / SecurityAccess / NRC / timing / memory layout, and a python scripts/generate_uds.py input.json output.xlsx Usage snippet. The 13-tab output mirrors what diagnostics teams actually hand to the OEM, so the workbook structure was already DoD-aligned before edits.
  • Correctly scoped to ISO 14229-1 (protocol-neutral UDS), keeping the skill off ISO 14229-3 (CAN-TP) and ISO 14229-5 (DoIP) which would belong in separate skills.
  • Inner zip is healthy: SKILL.md + scripts/generate_uds.py + recalc.py + a small scripts/office/ helper package. No dead files.

What to fix

  1. Trigger sentence was nearly empty (med). The frontmatter description ended with the boilerplate "Use this skill when the user mentions uds services builder." — i.e. the classifier had nothing to match on except the literal skill name. UDS-relevant requests phrased with the actual vocabulary the field uses (DID catalog, SecurityAccess, NRC, P2/P2*/S3, programming session) were not going to route here reliably.
  2. No disambiguation against neighbour skills (med). The repo also has odx-builder, cdd-builder, dtc-catalog-builder and dem-config-builder — all in the same broad neighbourhood. With a weak description the classifier could mis-route between them. Worth being explicit about who owns what.
  3. Service range and session names hidden in the body (low). The 0x10-0x86 range and the default / programming / extended session vocabulary appeared only in the body — surfacing them in the description gives the classifier harder anchors.

Edits applied this run

  • Rewrote the frontmatter description (now 953 chars, well under the 1024 limit): expanded triggers to name DIDs, RIDs, SecurityAccess, NRC, the three session types, P2/P2*/S3 timing, the 0x10-0x86 service range, and three casual phrasings ('spec the diagnostics for this ECU', 'what DIDs does this ECU support', 'write up the UDS services'). Added an explicit sibling-skill redirect for ODX (odx-builder), CANdela (cdd-builder), DTC inventory (dtc-catalog-builder), and the AUTOSAR Dem runtime layer (dem-config-builder).
  • Rewrote the ## Overview-area body trigger sentence to match: same vocab, same sibling redirects, slightly shorter to avoid prose bloat.
  • Body Inputs / Output / Usage sections left untouched — no refactor.

Deferred (not done this run)

  • The Output section currently flags 12. Validation Rules as "Input validation and constraints" but doesn't say which constraints get checked — a one-line example would make the contract clearer. Cosmetic, low value, left for a future pass.
  • Worth a symmetric pass on uds-services-checklist-reviewer.skill so the reviewer's description carries the same vocabulary; captured as a W23 follow-up candidate.
  • The Adaptive UDS / DoIP angle (ISO 14229-5) is not in scope for this skill and not in scope for this repo today — flag for product judgement, not for a polish pass.