Autonomous daily run. - POLISH: rewrote uds-services-builder frontmatter description (285->953 chars) with broad triggers + sibling-skill redirects to odx/cdd/dtc-catalog/dem-config - POLISH: aligned body trigger sentence with new description - LOG: docs/skill-polish-log/uds-services-builder.md created - STATUS regen: 76 builders / 76 reviewers / 100% paired (pairing overrides preserved) Generated by automotive-skills-daily-standup scheduled task.
3.3 KiB
3.3 KiB
Polish log — uds-services-builder.skill
2026-05-26 (autonomous POLISH run, W22 target #1 / issue #9, two-week carryover)
Domain: diagnostics · Severity: med · Outcome: small fix applied
What's good
- SKILL.md cleanly structured: an Input JSON schema, a 13-tab Output contract
enumerating service inventory / DID / RID / SecurityAccess / NRC / timing /
memory layout, and a
python scripts/generate_uds.py input.json output.xlsxUsage snippet. The 13-tab output mirrors what diagnostics teams actually hand to the OEM, so the workbook structure was already DoD-aligned before edits. - Correctly scoped to ISO 14229-1 (protocol-neutral UDS), keeping the skill off ISO 14229-3 (CAN-TP) and ISO 14229-5 (DoIP) which would belong in separate skills.
- Inner zip is healthy: SKILL.md +
scripts/generate_uds.py+recalc.py+ a smallscripts/office/helper package. No dead files.
What to fix
- Trigger sentence was nearly empty (med). The frontmatter
descriptionended with the boilerplate "Use this skill when the user mentions uds services builder." — i.e. the classifier had nothing to match on except the literal skill name. UDS-relevant requests phrased with the actual vocabulary the field uses (DID catalog, SecurityAccess, NRC, P2/P2*/S3, programming session) were not going to route here reliably. - No disambiguation against neighbour skills (med). The repo also has
odx-builder,cdd-builder,dtc-catalog-builderanddem-config-builder— all in the same broad neighbourhood. With a weak description the classifier could mis-route between them. Worth being explicit about who owns what. - Service range and session names hidden in the body (low). The 0x10-0x86 range and the default / programming / extended session vocabulary appeared only in the body — surfacing them in the description gives the classifier harder anchors.
Edits applied this run
- Rewrote the frontmatter
description(now 953 chars, well under the 1024 limit): expanded triggers to name DIDs, RIDs, SecurityAccess, NRC, the three session types, P2/P2*/S3 timing, the 0x10-0x86 service range, and three casual phrasings ('spec the diagnostics for this ECU', 'what DIDs does this ECU support', 'write up the UDS services'). Added an explicit sibling-skill redirect for ODX (odx-builder), CANdela (cdd-builder), DTC inventory (dtc-catalog-builder), and the AUTOSAR Dem runtime layer (dem-config-builder). - Rewrote the
## Overview-area body trigger sentence to match: same vocab, same sibling redirects, slightly shorter to avoid prose bloat. - Body Inputs / Output / Usage sections left untouched — no refactor.
Deferred (not done this run)
- The Output section currently flags
12. Validation Rulesas "Input validation and constraints" but doesn't say which constraints get checked — a one-line example would make the contract clearer. Cosmetic, low value, left for a future pass. - Worth a symmetric pass on
uds-services-checklist-reviewer.skillso the reviewer's description carries the same vocabulary; captured as a W23 follow-up candidate. - The Adaptive UDS / DoIP angle (ISO 14229-5) is not in scope for this skill and not in scope for this repo today — flag for product judgement, not for a polish pass.