auto(polish): W22 #5 dfmea-builder pass, regen STATUS, journal

Autonomous daily run.
- dfmea-builder polish-log entry — read end-to-end, no .skill edits needed
- Description 672/1024 chars; frontmatter clean; AIAG-VDA 2019 framing correct
- Three low-priority polish ideas captured but deferred (not 'small obvious')
- STATUS.md regenerated: 76 builders / 76 reviewers / 100% paired
- W22 polish phase now covers all 5 targets (uds, hara, cs-concept, aspice, dfmea)

Generated by automotive-skills-daily-standup scheduled task.
This commit is contained in:
Automotive Skills Autonomous
2026-05-27 11:05:58 +00:00
parent 985078096b
commit 04482aaf73
3 changed files with 79 additions and 7 deletions
+7 -7
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# STATUS — automotive-skills-suite
_Auto-generated 2026-05-26 by automotive-skills-daily-standup (POLISH run)._
_Auto-generated 2026-05-27 by automotive-skills-daily-standup (POLISH run)._
| Builder | Domain | Paired Reviewer | Last Touched | Flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ _Auto-generated 2026-05-26 by automotive-skills-daily-standup (POLISH run)._
| traceability-matrix-builder.skill | v&v | traceability-matrix-checklist-reviewer.skill | 2026-05-02 | 🟢 paired & touched ≤30 days |
| triggering-conditions-builder.skill | sotif | triggering-conditions-checklist-reviewer.skill | 2026-05-01 | 🟢 paired & touched ≤30 days |
| tsc-builder.skill | safety | tsc-checklist-reviewer.skill | 2026-05-01 | 🟢 paired & touched ≤30 days |
| uds-services-builder.skill | diagnostics | uds-services-checklist-reviewer.skill | 2026-05-02 | 🟢 paired & touched ≤30 days |
| uds-services-builder.skill | diagnostics | uds-services-checklist-reviewer.skill | 2026-05-26 | 🟢 paired & touched ≤30 days |
| validation-plan-builder.skill | v&v | validation-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill | 2026-05-02 | 🟢 paired & touched ≤30 days |
| verification-plan-builder.skill | v&v | verification-plan-checklist-reviewer.skill | 2026-05-02 | 🟢 paired & touched ≤30 days |
| vv-execution-report-builder.skill | v&v | vv-execution-report-checklist-reviewer.skill | 2026-05-02 | 🟢 paired & touched ≤30 days |
@@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ _Auto-generated 2026-05-26 by automotive-skills-daily-standup (POLISH run)._
## Summary
- Total builders: 76
- Total reviewers: 76
- Paired: 76 / 76 (100%)
- 🟢 76 paired & fresh · 🟡 0 stale (30+ days) · 🔴 0 orphan builders
- Generated 2026-05-26 — next refresh on the following autonomous run.
- **Builders:** 76
- **Reviewers:** 76
- **Paired:** 76/76 (100%)
- **🟢 Recent (≤30d):** 76 • **🟡 Stale (>30d):** 0 • **🔴 Orphan:** 0
- **Domains represented:** 14
+14
View File
@@ -278,3 +278,17 @@ Standout finding is non-DoD and more impactful than the trigger gaps: the SKILL.
- Issue #9 (uds-services polish target) is now actually done — flag for human to close, or let Sunday TRIAGE add a "completed-this-week" comment.
- The STATUS classifier still embeds pairing overrides inline (#10 still unserviced after 7+ runs); recommend Monday W23 PLAN promote #10 to a tooling slot rather than another polish target.
- Worth a symmetric pass on uds-services-checklist-reviewer.skill so the reviewer description carries the same vocabulary — captured as a W23 follow-up.
## 2026-05-27 (autonomous run, POLISH)
**Mode:** POLISH
**Action:** W22 #5 dfmea-builder polish pass — read end-to-end, audited, polish-log entry written, no .skill edits needed.
**Files touched:** docs/skill-polish-log/dfmea-builder.md (new), STATUS.md (regen), docs/AUTONOMOUS_LOG.md (this entry)
**Tests:** N/A (no test suite in this repo yet)
**Skill count:** 76 builders / 76 reviewers / 100% paired
**Open issues:** 11
**Notes:** Picked dfmea-builder per W22 plan target #5 (issue #12) — the only W22 target without a prior polish-log entry. Read the unzipped SKILL.md end-to-end. Description is 672/1024 chars, both required frontmatter fields present, no typos, no broken file references, AIAG-VDA 2019 methodology correctly framed (RPN→AP). Spotted three low-priority polish opportunities (casual trigger phrasings, AP rule prose vs table, "Lessons Learned" naming consistency) but deliberately DID NOT apply any edits to the .skill itself — none of them clear the "small obvious fix" bar set in the standup. With this run, all five W22 targets (uds, hara, cs-concept, aspice-assessment, dfmea) now have polish-log coverage; W22 polish phase is effectively complete heading into Fri DOCS.
**Follow-ups:**
- Fri DOCS run should roll W22 polish commits into CHANGELOG.
- Consider closing W22 tracking issues (#3, #4, #5, #9, #12) once human reviews polish-log entries. Auto-runs do NOT close issues per hard rules.
- If a future POLISH pass wants to extend the dfmea-builder description with casual trigger phrasings, ~350 chars of headroom remain under the 1024 cap.
+58
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
# Polish log — dfmea-builder.skill
## 2026-05-27 (W22 #5 POLISH pass)
**Mode:** read-only review (no edits to .skill applied)
**Tracker:** issue #12
### What's good
- **Frontmatter clean.** `name` and `description` both present; description is 672 chars
(well under the 1024 hard cap, plenty of headroom for future trigger phrasings).
- **Description trigger surface is broad and concrete.** Covers the exact deliverable
(AIAG-VDA 2019 Design FMEA workbook), the methodology distinction (7-step process,
Action Priority lookup, NOT RPN multiplication), the visible outputs (12-tab xlsx,
color-coded AP cells), and a "use this instead of freeform" assertion. Should fire
reliably on "DFMEA", "Design FMEA", "AIAG-VDA", and adjacent phrasings.
- **AIAG-VDA 2019 alignment is correct.** The replacement of classical RPN by the
Action Priority lookup is the headline change in the 2019 harmonized edition, and
the SKILL.md flags it prominently in both the description and the body.
- **Body is well-structured.** Clear "When to use" list, JSON input example, 7-step
walkthrough mapped to specific tabs, scripts invocation, analyst review checklist,
output structure table (tabs 0011), AP formula spelled out, common pitfalls.
- **Bundled references are appropriate.** Severity / Occurrence / Detection tables
plus the AP lookup table plus a methodology doc — exactly the AIAG-VDA reference
set an analyst would expect to consult while filling out the worksheet.
- **Examples directory has a realistic seed.** `sample_dfmea_input_esc.json` (ESC ECU)
matches the example file path referenced in the SKILL.md body — no broken link.
### What to fix
Nothing critical. A few low-priority polish items noted for a future pass (NOT
applied this run per the "small and shipped" rule):
- **Description could optionally add casual trigger phrasings** in the style of
fsc-builder and hara-builder (e.g., "even casual phrasings like 'I need a design
FMEA for this ECU' or 'analyze the failure modes of my design'"). Current
description trips on the literal terms but a casual phrase like "what could go
wrong with this design" might miss. Low priority — most real users will say DFMEA
explicitly. Defer.
- **AP rule in body is a simplified prose summary**, not the full AIAG-VDA Table P.1.
The bundled `references/action_priority_table.md` carries the authoritative table,
so this is acceptable — the body is teaching intuition, not the contract. No fix.
- **"Lessons Learned cross-reference" in description vs "Lessons Learned & Crossref"
in the tab listing** — a minor naming inconsistency but both phrasings convey the
same concept and the description form reads more naturally in prose. Defer.
### Severity
**Low.** No blocking issues; no required frontmatter missing; no description
overflow; no broken file references; no methodology errors. Skill is in
production-ready shape. Re-touch only if a downstream classifier flags a miss
on the casual-phrase trigger surface.
### Suggested edits
None applied this pass. If a future pass wants to extend the description with
casual triggers, it must stay under 1024 chars total (currently 672, so ~350 chars
of headroom remain).