auto(polish): W23 #1 cs-concept-builder pass, regen STATUS, journal
Autonomous daily run. - W23 target #1 (issue #4, four-week carryover): re-audit against byte-identical archive, append W23 dated polish-log section - Three open DoD findings (CSR derivation / CAL allocation / CSI handoff trigger placement) all editorial — outside the autonomous-edit allowlist; W20 rewrite remains the human action - STATUS.md regen: domain rule-order fix so safety-program-* / safety-gate-* classify as program-mgmt not safety; fmeda / msa-gage / spc-chart added to safety / quality respectively; spread matches W22-RELEASE STATUS (safety=15, quality=10, program-mgmt=5, ...) - Fresh/stale flags shift: as of 2026-06-02 only autosar-swc and uds-services remain 🟢; rest of suite is 30d+ stale (2/74) Generated by automotive-skills-daily-standup scheduled task.
This commit is contained in:
Automotive Skills Autonomous
@@ -146,3 +146,108 @@ phrases in the first 400 chars) is now the second consecutive POLISH finding —
|
||||
`hara-builder` (W20-T1, Tue) and `cs-concept-builder` (W20-T2, today) both shipped
|
||||
this same shape. Worth flagging in the next PLAN as a suite-wide DoD audit
|
||||
candidate rather than per-skill chasing.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-06-02 — W23 POLISH pass (four-week carryover from W20)
|
||||
|
||||
**Mode:** POLISH (Tuesday)
|
||||
**File reviewed:** `skills/cs-concept-builder.skill` (ZIP archive; inner SKILL.md is 9,760 bytes / 133 lines).
|
||||
**Tracking issue:** [#4](https://github.com/jherrodthomas/automotive-skills-suite/issues/4) (open, four-week carryover).
|
||||
**Plan reference:** target #1 in `docs/weekly/WEEK-2026-W23.md` (top of W23 priority list).
|
||||
|
||||
### File-state check vs. previous passes
|
||||
|
||||
The archive is unchanged since the W20 inspection — every inner-file mtime is
|
||||
`2026-05-01 07:55–07:58`, the SKILL.md is still 9,760 bytes / 133 lines, and the
|
||||
top-level `.skill` was last touched by the initial seed commit f8d97993 on
|
||||
2026-05-01. No drift, no regressions, nothing to undo.
|
||||
|
||||
Re-ran the W20 trigger-coverage check fresh against the current bytes rather
|
||||
than trusting the prior log:
|
||||
|
||||
| DoD check (W20) | This pass |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Description ≤ 1024 chars | **PASS** — 784 chars (unchanged, ~240 headroom) |
|
||||
| Frontmatter has required fields (`name`, `description`) | **PASS** |
|
||||
| AAICAN list intact in canonical order | **PASS** — all six properties present at offsets 255 / 271 / 286 / 297 / 314 / 328 (all inside the 400-char window) |
|
||||
| `Cybersecurity Concept` in first 400 chars | **PASS** — offset 38 |
|
||||
| `ISO/SAE 21434` in first 400 chars | **PASS** — offset 24 |
|
||||
| `six security properties` in first 400 chars | **PASS** — offset 230 |
|
||||
| `CSR` in first 400 chars | **PASS** — offset 360 (verb form, not the noun phrase `CSR derivation`) |
|
||||
| `CAL` standalone | **MARGINAL** — offset 410, just outside the 400-char window |
|
||||
| `CSR derivation` (formal trigger) in first 400 chars | **FAIL** — offset 607 (same gap W20 found; the noun phrase only appears inside the "Use this skill whenever the user mentions…" trigger list) |
|
||||
| `CAL allocation` (formal trigger) anywhere in description | **FAIL** — literal noun phrase absent entirely. Closest is the verb form `allocates CAL per architectural element` at offset 400. |
|
||||
| `CSI handoff` (plain form) in description | **FAIL** — only the parenthesized form `CSI (Cybersecurity Implementation) hand-off` appears, at offset 497. |
|
||||
| Typo scan (`teh recieve seperate occured definately accomodate begining wether adress arguement existance reccommend reccomend`) | **PASS** — no hits. |
|
||||
|
||||
Archive file-tree cross-check against `unzip -l` matches the "Files in this
|
||||
skill" block in the SKILL.md footer exactly — same nine entries
|
||||
(`SKILL.md`, `scripts/{generate_cs_concept.py, cs_goals_reader.py, recalc.py,
|
||||
office/{__init__.py, soffice.py}}`, `references/{methodology.md,
|
||||
csr_templates.md}`, `examples/sample_cs_concept_input_esc.json`). No
|
||||
dbc-builder-style packaging drift here.
|
||||
|
||||
### Autonomous-edit allowlist decision
|
||||
|
||||
The standup spec defines the autonomous-edit allowlist narrowly: **typo,
|
||||
description > 1024 chars, missing required frontmatter field**. None of the
|
||||
three triggers fire here:
|
||||
|
||||
- Description is 784 chars — well under cap.
|
||||
- Both required frontmatter keys (`name`, `description`) are present.
|
||||
- Zero typos in the SKILL.md body or frontmatter.
|
||||
|
||||
The three open DoD findings are all editorial trigger-coverage rewrites of the
|
||||
description, identical to the gaps caught in the W20 entry. Applying the
|
||||
W20-proposed rewrite (~970 chars, reshuffles `CSR derivation` / `CAL
|
||||
allocation` / `CSI handoff` into the first 400 chars and adds two casual
|
||||
framings) would touch roughly **600 of the 784 description chars** — the same
|
||||
"editorial restructure, not surgical fix" judgement the W22 hara-builder pass
|
||||
applied to its proposed rewrite, and outside the standup's "small and shipped
|
||||
beats big and broken" rule.
|
||||
|
||||
**No edits committed this run.** Findings carry forward unchanged.
|
||||
|
||||
### Why this is the fourth straight pass without a code edit
|
||||
|
||||
W20 (2026-05-13) drafted the rewrite. W21 PLAN deprioritized cs-concept in
|
||||
favour of newer targets; no POLISH touch. W22 PLAN re-included cs-concept as
|
||||
target #4 but the actual W22 POLISH cycle (uds → dfmea → hara) consumed all
|
||||
three slots before reaching it — flagged in the W22 RELEASE journal as the
|
||||
explicit reason cs-concept must lead W23. W23 PLAN promoted it to target #1,
|
||||
which is why today's pass exists.
|
||||
|
||||
The pattern is now clear and worth stating out loud: **the cs-concept-builder
|
||||
description is functionally fine** (84 chars over budget would change that;
|
||||
missing frontmatter would change that; typos would change that) **but it
|
||||
fails one specific DoD that the autonomous loop is not permitted to fix**.
|
||||
Either the human approves the W20 rewrite and this issue closes, or the DoD
|
||||
gets relaxed in a future PLAN, or the issue stays in carryover indefinitely.
|
||||
A fifth POLISH pass next month would produce the same log entry for the same
|
||||
reasons — diminishing returns are real here.
|
||||
|
||||
### Severity roll-up (unchanged from W20)
|
||||
|
||||
| Finding | Severity | Action |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| `CAL allocation` absent from description | low | W20-proposed rewrite drafted; await human review |
|
||||
| `CSR derivation` outside first 400 chars | low | folded into the same proposed rewrite |
|
||||
| `CSI handoff` plain form absent | low (optional) | folded into the same proposed rewrite |
|
||||
| Casual framings thin / not verbatim | low (optional) | folded into the same proposed rewrite |
|
||||
|
||||
### Follow-ups for the human
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Decide on the W20-proposed rewrite of the description** (block quote in
|
||||
the 2026-05-13 entry above). If approved, it lands as a one-shot edit and
|
||||
issue [#4](https://github.com/jherrodthomas/automotive-skills-suite/issues/4)
|
||||
closes the same day. If rejected, the issue should be closed as `won't fix
|
||||
(outside autonomous scope)` to break the four-week loop.
|
||||
2. **Suite-wide DoD audit** for the trigger-coverage gap is still recommended
|
||||
(`hara-builder`, `cs-concept-builder`, and likely `tara-builder` /
|
||||
`fmeda-builder` / `aspice-assessment-builder` carry the same shape). One
|
||||
focused audit replaces five carryover loops. Captured in the W23 PLAN
|
||||
notes; still not scheduled.
|
||||
3. **Optional:** fold the autonomous-edit allowlist into the standup spec
|
||||
explicitly so future runs have a citeable rule for declining editorial
|
||||
rewrites without re-deriving the decision each visit.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user