Includes builder + reviewer pairs covering ISO 26262, ISO/SAE 21434, ISO 21448, IATF 16949 (APQP/PPAP/FMEA), ASPICE PAM 3.1, plus 5 continuous improvement quality tools.
Automotive Safety Suite
76 installable Claude skills covering the full automotive safety, cybersecurity, quality, and process-assessment lifecycle
Every artifact-producing skill is paired with a confirmation reviewer. Reviewer outputs include a visual dashboard with KPI tiles, charts, and findings tables.
Quickstart · The Chain · Skills · Standards · Why
What this is
A curated set of 38 builder skills + 38 matching confirmation reviewer skills that automate the structured xlsx deliverables required across the automotive engineering lifecycle:
- ISO 26262 functional safety (concept → HW → SW → safety case)
- ISO/SAE 21434 cybersecurity (TARA → goals → concept → architecture → IR plan)
- ISO 21448 SOTIF for ADAS/AV (analysis → triggering conditions → validation strategy)
- AIAG-VDA quality (APQP → DFMEA → PFMEA → Control Plan → PPAP)
- Automotive SPICE (assessment → gap analysis → improvement → evidence)
- Continuous improvement (8D, 5-Why, fishbone, MSA Gauge R&R, SPC)
Each skill is an installable .skill file. The chain is the moat — every downstream skill consumes the upstream skill's xlsx output as a stable file-format contract.
Quickstart
- Download the skill you need from
skills/(or the full bundle from Releases) - Click "Save skill" in Cowork / Claude Desktop to install
- Trigger by phrasing — every skill declares its triggering description in its frontmatter
# Example: install the HARA builder, then ask Claude
"Build a HARA for a new ECU project — Electronic Stability Control"
The chain
Item Definition → Safety Plan → DIA
↓
HARA → FSC → TSC
↓ ↓
HW Lane SW Lane
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
HW-SR Arch HSI FMEDA SW-SR Arch FMEA HSI
↓ ↓
Safety Case (capstone)
Parallel chains:
TARA → CS Goals → CS Concept → CS Architecture → IR Plan + Secure Coding (ISO/SAE 21434)
SOTIF Analysis → Triggering Conditions → Validation Strategy (ISO 21448)
APQP Plan → DFMEA → PFMEA → Control Plan → PPAP Package (IATF 16949)
ASPICE Assessment → Gap Analysis → Improvement Plan → Process Evidence (ASPICE PAM)
Every box above has a builder skill AND a matching reviewer skill.
Skills
Foundation (3 builder/reviewer pairs)
| Skill | Standard |
|---|---|
item-definition-builder + reviewer |
ISO 26262-3 §5 |
safety-plan-builder + reviewer |
ISO 26262-2 §6 |
dia-builder + reviewer |
ISO 26262-8 §5 |
ISO 26262 Concept Phase (3 pairs)
| Skill | What it produces |
|---|---|
hara-builder + reviewer |
Hazard Analysis with 14 malfunction guide words and Cartesian (function × malfunction × environment) |
fsc-builder + reviewer |
FTA per safety goal with visual fault tree rendering, FSR derivation, ASIL decomposition |
tsc-builder + reviewer |
HW-TSR/SW-TSR with safety mechanisms, HSI scaffold, system FMEA, DFA, draw.io architecture diagram |
ISO 26262 HW Lane (4 pairs, Part 5)
| Skill | What it produces |
|---|---|
hw-safety-reqs-builder + reviewer |
HW Safety Requirements derived from HW-TSRs |
hw-architecture-builder + reviewer |
Refined HW architecture (PCB / IC / package) with safety mechanism allocation |
hsi-builder + reviewer |
Contract-grade HW-SW Interface with C header generation |
fmeda-builder + reviewer |
Formula-driven SPFM/LFM/PMHF with auto-verification against per-ASIL targets |
ISO 26262 SW Lane (4 pairs, Part 6)
| Skill | What it produces |
|---|---|
sw-arch-builder + reviewer |
SW architecture with RTOS, scheduling, MPU partitioning, MISRA targets |
sw-sr-builder + reviewer |
SW Safety Requirements with verification methods per ASIL |
sw-fmea-builder + reviewer |
Software FMEA with qualitative residual risk per ASIL threshold |
sw-hsis-builder + reviewer |
SW-side HSI with handler functions and C header |
ISO 26262 Capstone
| Skill | What it produces |
|---|---|
safety-case-builder + reviewer |
GSN-style argument pulling evidence from all upstream artifacts |
ISO/SAE 21434 Cybersecurity (6 pairs, UN R155 mandated)
| Skill | What it produces |
|---|---|
tara-builder + reviewer |
Threat Analysis with STRIDE coverage and Risk Value lookup |
cs-goals-builder + reviewer |
Cybersecurity Goals with CAL assignment |
cs-concept-builder + reviewer |
CSR derivation per cybersecurity property |
cs-architecture-builder + reviewer |
Cryptographic inventory, key management, secure boot chain |
incident-response-plan-builder + reviewer |
PSIRT plan with UN R155 / ENISA / NHTSA notification deadlines |
secure-coding-guidelines-builder + reviewer |
CERT C + MISRA Amendment 1 + AUTOSAR C++14 secure subset |
ISO 21448 SOTIF (3 pairs, ADAS / AV)
| Skill | What it produces |
|---|---|
sotif-analysis-builder + reviewer |
ODD, performance limitations, scenario quadrant classification |
triggering-conditions-builder + reviewer |
Environmental / sensor / road / road-user / system / driver triggering conditions |
sotif-validation-strategy-builder + reviewer |
Real-world / simulation / proving ground / field monitoring campaign |
AIAG-VDA Quality (5 pairs, IATF 16949)
| Skill | What it produces |
|---|---|
apqp-plan-builder + reviewer |
5-phase product quality plan with gate reviews |
dfmea-builder + reviewer |
Design FMEA per AIAG-VDA 2019 (Action Priority replaces RPN) |
pfmea-builder + reviewer |
Process FMEA per AIAG-VDA 2019 |
control-plan-builder + reviewer |
Production Control Plan with SPC / 100% / mistake-proofing / audit |
ppap-package-builder + reviewer |
18-element PPAP submission with PSW |
Automotive SPICE (4 pairs)
| Skill | What it produces |
|---|---|
aspice-assessment-builder + reviewer |
Per-process Capability Level scoring per PAM 3.1 |
aspice-gap-analysis-builder + reviewer |
Gaps to target CL with severity classification |
aspice-improvement-plan-builder + reviewer |
Improvement roadmap with KPIs |
aspice-process-evidence-builder + reviewer |
Per-process evidence package |
Continuous Improvement (5 pairs)
| Skill | What it produces |
|---|---|
8d-problem-solving-builder + reviewer |
8D method (D1-D8) for warranty / customer complaint |
5-why-builder + reviewer |
5-Why root cause analysis |
fishbone-builder + reviewer |
Ishikawa (6Ms) cause-and-effect with auto-Mermaid diagram |
msa-gage-rr-builder + reviewer |
AIAG MSA 4th edition with Anova-based Gauge R&R |
spc-chart-builder + reviewer |
SPC with Cpk capability and Western Electric / Nelson rules |
Standards covered
ISO 26262:2018 · ISO/SAE 21434:2021 · ISO 21448:2022 · IATF 16949:2016 · AIAG APQP 2nd edition · AIAG-VDA FMEA Handbook 2019 · AIAG PPAP 4th edition · AIAG MSA 4th edition · AIAG SPC 2nd edition · AIAG Control Plan · ASPICE PAM 3.1 / 4.0 · UN R155 · UN R156 · CERT C Secure Coding · MISRA C:2012 + Amendment 1 · AUTOSAR C++14
Why
Every automotive program ships an avalanche of structured deliverables. Most teams maintain them in xlsx, painstakingly hand-edited, with low audit-trail consistency and high re-keying overhead between phases. This suite turns each phase into a builder + reviewer pair where:
- The builder produces the structured xlsx output from a JSON input plus the upstream artifact
- The reviewer runs a confirmation-measures checklist on the builder's output and produces a visual dashboard with KPIs, charts, and findings
The chain compounds because phases hand off via stable xlsx contracts. A change upstream (HARA) automatically propagates to every downstream skill that consumes it (FSC → TSC → FMEDA → Safety Case).
Common patterns across the suite
- All builder outputs use a consistent NAVY/Calibri styling palette with ASIL/CAL color coding
- All reviewer outputs include visual dashboards (KPI tiles, pie chart, compliance bar, stacked rating breakdown by section, findings table)
- Many reviewers auto-verify quantitative thresholds:
- FMEDA: SPFM / LFM / PMHF vs ASIL target
- PPAP: Cpk vs threshold (1.33 standard, 1.67 special characteristics)
- SW FMEA: residual risk vs ASIL threshold
- MSA: Gauge R&R % vs AIAG threshold
- SPC: Cpk vs target
- Reviewers never modify source artifacts — gaps land in Recommended Actions
- Every builder is paired with a reviewer for confirmation-measures compliance
Repo structure
automotive-safety-suite/
├── skills/ # 76 .skill bundles, install individually
├── automotive-safety-suite-bundle.zip # All 76 skills in one download
├── README.md
└── LICENSE
Installation
Each .skill file in skills/ is independently installable. Skills declare triggering descriptions in their frontmatter, so the agent picks them up based on user phrasing (e.g., "build me a HARA" triggers hara-builder).
License
MIT — see LICENSE file.
Built with Claude. Designed for automotive safety, cybersecurity, and quality engineers shipping real programs.