auto(polish): W22 #2 hara-builder pass, regen STATUS, journal
Autonomous daily run. - POLISH: hara-builder W22 audit (carryover from W20, issue #3); file byte-identical to W20 inspection; description 911/1024 chars, frontmatter clean; no autonomous-allowlist edits; W22 entry appended to polish-log. - STATUS regen: 76/76 paired (item-def + ppap alias overrides held); date-stamp delta only — underlying skill data unchanged since W22 #5 dfmea pass. Generated by automotive-skills-daily-standup scheduled task.
This commit is contained in:
Automotive Skills Autonomous
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# STATUS — automotive-skills-suite
|
||||
|
||||
_Auto-generated 2026-05-27 by automotive-skills-daily-standup (POLISH run)._
|
||||
_Auto-generated 2026-05-28 by automotive-skills-daily-standup (POLISH run)._
|
||||
|
||||
| Builder | Domain | Paired Reviewer | Last Touched | Flag |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -292,3 +292,18 @@ Standout finding is non-DoD and more impactful than the trigger gaps: the SKILL.
|
||||
- Fri DOCS run should roll W22 polish commits into CHANGELOG.
|
||||
- Consider closing W22 tracking issues (#3, #4, #5, #9, #12) once human reviews polish-log entries. Auto-runs do NOT close issues per hard rules.
|
||||
- If a future POLISH pass wants to extend the dfmea-builder description with casual trigger phrasings, ~350 chars of headroom remain under the 1024 cap.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-28 (autonomous run, POLISH)
|
||||
|
||||
**Mode:** POLISH
|
||||
**Action:** W22 #2 hara-builder polish pass — re-evaluated against current archive, appended W22 dated section to existing polish-log, no .skill edits applied per autonomous-edit allowlist.
|
||||
**Files touched:** docs/skill-polish-log/hara-builder.md (appended), STATUS.md (regen — date-stamp delta only, underlying skill data unchanged), docs/AUTONOMOUS_LOG.md (this entry)
|
||||
**Tests:** N/A (no test suite in this repo yet)
|
||||
**Skill count:** 76 builders / 76 reviewers / 100% paired
|
||||
**Open issues:** 11
|
||||
**Notes:** Picked hara-builder per W22 plan target #2 (issue #3, three-week carryover) — yesterday's dfmea entry overstated W22 coverage when it claimed "W22 polish phase effectively complete." Three of the W22 plan targets (hara, cs-concept, aspice-assessment) had only W20-dated polish-log entries, and the W22 plan DoD explicitly asks for a fresh per-skill audit. Today's pick was hara because: (a) issue #3 is the longest-open polish issue, (b) all three remaining carryovers shared a last-touched date so plan order broke the tie, (c) hara has the densest SKILL.md of the three. Re-ran the trigger-coverage and char-count checks against the current archive — file is byte-identical to the W20 inspection (`2026-04-28 07:08` mtime preserved), so the W20 findings still stand: description 911/1024 chars, frontmatter clean, 6 of 7 strict trigger phrases inside the 400-char window, "safety goal" misses at char 454. The W20 entry already drafted an editorial rewrite that would close all three open findings; today's entry refrains from applying it because the change exceeds the autonomous-edit allowlist (typo / over-length / missing required field) and the suite-wide trigger-coverage DoD audit flagged in earlier passes is the better vehicle. STATUS regen: hit the same `item-definition→item-def` and `ppap-package→ppap` pairing alias overrides; preserved both to keep 76/76 paired headline intact (this is the 4th run where the overrides have been needed; issue #10 to freeze the classifier remains open).
|
||||
**Follow-ups:**
|
||||
- Tomorrow (Fri) DOCS: roll W22 polish commits (uds, dfmea, hara) into CHANGELOG; create example/<skill>/README.md stubs for the three touched skills if absent.
|
||||
- Open issues #3, #4, #5, #9, #12 all now have W22 polish-log coverage (or in the case of #4/#5 still need a fresh W22 visit) — flag for human triage at human convenience. Auto-runs do NOT close issues per hard rules.
|
||||
- cs-concept (#4) and aspice-assessment (#5) still owe a W22-dated polish-log entry; depending on Fri DOCS and Sat RELEASE workload, one or both may slip to W23 — accept and move on.
|
||||
- Issue #10 (classifier freeze) is now 7 runs old; STATUS.md generator is still ~50 lines of inline Python in each commit. Strongly recommend Mon W23 PLAN allocate one tooling slot to extract `scripts/classify_skill.py` so future POLISH runs can `python scripts/classify_skill.py > STATUS.md` instead of carrying the alias map by hand.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -108,3 +108,87 @@ names it). All five DoD triggers + the bonus "concept phase" hit the description
|
||||
**No code edits committed in this run.** Issue #3 stays open with this log linked from
|
||||
the journal entry. Next autonomous touch on this skill: probably W21 if it stays in the
|
||||
LRT bucket, otherwise close on human approval of the rewrite.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-28 — W22 POLISH pass (carryover from W20)
|
||||
|
||||
**Mode:** POLISH (Thursday)
|
||||
**File reviewed:** `skills/hara-builder.skill` (ZIP archive; SKILL.md is 12,273 bytes / 146 lines).
|
||||
**Tracking issue:** [#3](https://github.com/jherrodthomas/automotive-skills-suite/issues/3) (open).
|
||||
**Plan reference:** target #2 in `docs/weekly/WEEK-2026-W22.md` (carryover from W20).
|
||||
|
||||
### File-state check vs. previous pass
|
||||
|
||||
The archive has not changed since the W20 pass (`2026-04-28 07:08` mtime on every
|
||||
entry inside the `.skill`). The SKILL.md byte size, line count, and frontmatter all
|
||||
match what the 2026-05-12 entry above recorded. So everything that was true then is
|
||||
still true now — no regressions, no drift.
|
||||
|
||||
Re-ran the trigger-coverage check fresh against the current file rather than trusting
|
||||
the prior log:
|
||||
|
||||
| DoD check (W20) | This pass |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Description ≤ 1024 chars | **PASS** — 911 chars (unchanged) |
|
||||
| Frontmatter has required fields (`name`, `description`) | **PASS** |
|
||||
| `HARA` in first 400 chars | **PASS** — char 71 |
|
||||
| `hazard analysis` in first 400 chars | **PASS** — char 34 |
|
||||
| `ASIL` in first 400 chars | **PASS** — char 285 |
|
||||
| `item definition` in first 400 chars | **PASS** — char 94 |
|
||||
| `safety goal` in first 400 chars | **FAIL** — char 454 (same gap the W20 pass found) |
|
||||
| `ISO 26262` in first 400 chars | **PASS** — char 24 |
|
||||
| `concept phase` (bonus, not strict DoD) | **FAIL** — char 672 |
|
||||
|
||||
Also did a fresh typo scan (`teh recieve seperate occured definately accomodate
|
||||
begining wether`) — no hits. Step headers all use em-dashes consistently (Step 1
|
||||
through Step 5). Archive file tree matches the "Files in this skill" block at the
|
||||
bottom of SKILL.md exactly (cross-checked against `unzip -l`).
|
||||
|
||||
### Autonomous-edit allowlist decision
|
||||
|
||||
The autonomous-edit allowlist is narrow: **typo / description > 1024 chars / missing
|
||||
required frontmatter field**. None of the three conditions hold here. The only open
|
||||
DoD gap — `safety goal` reordered into the first 400 chars — is an editorial sentence
|
||||
re-ordering, not a surgical fix. Per the standing rule ("NEVER do large refactors —
|
||||
small and shipped beats big and broken"), I am leaving the .skill file untouched.
|
||||
|
||||
**No edits committed in this run.** The proposed rewrite from the 2026-05-12 entry
|
||||
above remains the recommended human action.
|
||||
|
||||
### Why not just apply the W20-proposed rewrite this run?
|
||||
|
||||
Two reasons. (a) The proposed rewrite touches ~600 chars of the 911-char description
|
||||
— that crosses the line from "small obvious fix" into "editorial restructure," which
|
||||
the spec reserves for human review. (b) The rewrite was drafted two POLISH cycles
|
||||
ago and the suite-wide trigger-coverage pattern (hara, cs-concept, aspice — three
|
||||
in a row, see notes at the bottom of the W20 entries) has been flagged for a
|
||||
suite-wide DoD audit in W21/W22 PLANs. A point fix here would short-circuit that
|
||||
audit before it lands.
|
||||
|
||||
### Severity roll-up (unchanged from W20)
|
||||
|
||||
| Finding | Severity | Action |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| `safety goal` outside first 400 chars | low | proposed rewrite drafted in W20 entry; await human review |
|
||||
| Long "Produces..." enumeration clause | low | folded into the same proposed rewrite |
|
||||
| No `concept phase` trigger up front | low (optional) | folded into the same proposed rewrite |
|
||||
|
||||
### Follow-ups for the human
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Approve or modify the W20 proposed rewrite of the description** (block quote near
|
||||
the end of the 2026-05-12 entry). If approved, it can land as a one-shot edit and
|
||||
issue [#3](https://github.com/jherrodthomas/automotive-skills-suite/issues/3)
|
||||
closes the same day.
|
||||
2. **Decide whether the suite-wide trigger-coverage DoD audit is W23 PLAN-eligible.**
|
||||
Three consecutive POLISH passes (hara → cs-concept → aspice) have shipped the
|
||||
same shape; one focused audit pass is cheaper than chasing individual skills.
|
||||
3. **Optional:** consider adding `concept phase` to the canonical trigger phrase
|
||||
list applied during the audit, since the same gap is likely present on
|
||||
`fsc-builder` and `tsc-builder` too.
|
||||
|
||||
This is the second POLISH visit to `hara-builder` and the file is unchanged between
|
||||
visits. If the human review of the W20 rewrite does not land before next month,
|
||||
the LRT rotation will surface this skill a third time — recommend either closing
|
||||
issue #3 with a "won't fix (within autonomous scope)" note, or merging the W20
|
||||
rewrite, to break the loop.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user